Education seemed magical to people who’d been previously
illiterate. For them it was a way to break the bondage of Colonialism. They had few alternatives literally. It was
either education or possibly being culled into forced labor, especially in
Africa. It also meant that natives could get the education to get better pay.
It allowed a certain amount of social mobility and elite status, but perhaps
this was also a kind of collusion or collaboration for those natives who
attained higher paying jobs via education, especially if they were
administrative jobs in nature. The natives felt so seduced by European culture
and what upward mobility within it could afford them. In India for example,
Bengalis ignored their Hindu faith’s prohibition against consumption of beef
because to consume western foods felt more sophisticated. European religions
such as Christianity were especially spread strongly in Africa where confidence
had been shaken in their pagan religions for a multitude of reasons, but
mainly, missionaries were providing the bulk of education opportunities in the
colonial world. Although, there was certainly syncretic elements carried over
from their pagan religions in the form of medicines and chants. Christianity,
however didn’t make much inroads in India. Interestingly, Hindu mystics and
scholars such as Swami Vivekananda seem to have integrated some of Christianity’s
tenents into Hinduism, but re-fashioning Hinduism to be both militant and
charitable. Hindus decided that they ought to make Hinduism a more respected
religion by committing to charity, feeding the poor, things that their
Christian colonial rulers would both respect and admire. They felt the best way
to preserve Hinduism was to have it’s scholars go west and share some of it’s
wisdom with intellectuals. For Africans and Indians, they began to look at
their history and accomplishments to find achievements on par with European
innovations. It seems that the idea of a pan-tribalism was an artificial
creation by European colonial powers. There probably were tribes, but not to
the extent that they were tribes after Europeans forced them to be defined due
to asking Africans to state their tribe and family groups on legal documents,
and work applications et cetera. It’s really been a major problem in African
history in modern times because this lead to national states in that
post-colonial era, which conflagated into conflicts between peoples that both
hadn’t existed as tribes in the past or they didn’t get along to begin with.
Some hoped living a
European lifestyle would somehow afford them more equality with whites, but not
a clear cut equality. Some felt that by embracing European culture that they
could somehow uses the tools of European laws and culture to reinvigorate their
own sense of nationalism. Some Vietnamese leaders like Nguyen Thai Hoc, who was
executed for crimes against the French believed until the end that they could
will the colonial system to achieve their own political ends. The leader who
would later lead North Vietnam, Ho Chi Min actually attended the Post-World War
I peace talks hoping he could use European political venues to legally petition
the European powers to grant Vietnam independence, long before he was ever a
communist: http://isq.sagepub.com/content/12/1/133.extract
No comments:
Post a Comment