I was somewhat surprised
to open this chapter and see it begin with a first person perspective. But, who
decided to write this narrative in first person. Perhaps Strayer, himself? The
author doesn’t say for sure. It seems odd that some Kenyans wouldn’t speak
their native languages with their fellow Kenyans where Europeans were around.
Apparently colonial authorities had fears and prejudices about teaching English
to Africans because they were afraid that they’d learn how to seduce White
women and corrupt their virtue. Of course, you don’t have to look to Africa to
find these kind of irrational fears. The 1915 film, “Birth of A Nation”
propogated these same fears. It is perhaps a holdover from slavery when there
were fears about slaves having education. Instead, the British like Americans
employed segregation in their African colonies, in which there was an insolated
world for Whites and a separate world from natives.
There was also a second
wave of colonialism in Africa and Asia after the European powers had their way
with the New World and had decimated the native populations there. Now they
turned their eyes eastward. Europeans found with their newfound industrial
wealth and powerful, modern armies to secure more resources that they could
annex and conquer more territories. Perhaps the simply wanted direct access to
the resources rather than go through the whole trouble of the triangle trades
to get spices and raw materials from Asian and African middlemen. So, but
conquering territories in Asia and Africa they were cutting the middlemen out
of the picture. The Europeans had just begun to develop primitive automatic
machine guns that decimated their Asian and African advisories. Africans were
however reduced by 75% in population by European diseases. They like Native
Americans had relatively few if any immunities to European diseases introduced
into their respective areas. It wasn’t necessarily easy for Europeans to conquer
new territories in Africa and the Asia, but it wasn’t really difficult either
these new forms of munitions. Tribal groups became dominated and Hindus in
India, for example simply saw the British as one empire taking the place of
their Mughal overlords of times past. The Europeans in some places practiced
similar divide and conquer tactics that the conquistadors had employed in the
new world by getting rival states that hated the empires dominating them to
join Europeans in toppling the empires they were trying to conquer, such as the
case in Indonesia, for example. In places like Australia and New Zealand, the
British employed a philosophy of “Terra Nellius,” meaning “no man’s land”
because the British didn’t recognize the Aborigines as having any property
rights analogous to European ideas of land ownership, so they took land with
the belief that it never belonged to anyone. Aborigines themselves didn’t even
make significant gains in acquiring lands back that had been taken from them
until the case of Mabo in Australia during the early 1990’s: http://www.nfsa.gov.au/digitallearning/mabo/tn_01.shtml
Of course,
some Asian powers were doing their own imperialism. Japan in this era also
began to annex territories in Taiwan and Korea, for example. U.S. and Russian
expansion also brought many Asians under the influence of European dominance.
No comments:
Post a Comment